Michelangelo Biography free essay sample

Here, he admired many of the works of Giotto and applied his simplistic yet powerful style onto his canvas, copying the artist’s figures in an extremely accurate manner (Ripley, page 8). Lorenzo de’ Medici, known as the Magnificent for his artistic gift and riches, approached Michelangelo one day. Shortly after, he moved to Lorenzo’s palace and began to enjoy his happy life. In the monastery of San Spirito, there was a hospital that young Michelangelo would often visit. Though some people in Florence considered dissecting corpses to be sinful, Michelangelo owed much of his knowledge of the human anatomy to such acts (Ripley, page 16). Throughout the rest of his natural life, Michelangelo was commissioned many projects. All of which, were amazingly captivating and seemingly brought forth a new style of extreme realism to the field of sculpture. Michelangelo was a fresh face in his time period. His art was clean and pure, and each detail was carved with precise care and labor. We will write a custom essay sample on Michelangelo Biography or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Born into the High Renaissance era which was extremely well known for featuring humanism, a definite light source, more naturalism, and no halos on angelshe soon became an influential painter in the development of Mannerism—a period that was classified by clashing colors, abnormally elongated limbs, emotion, bizarre themes, and an undefined light source, which was entirely different from the High Renaissance in which Michelangelo was birthed into. Michelangelo, as an artist, was a bit ahead of his time. While other artists were still attempting to master the human anatomy, Michelangelo was already mastering the facial expressions that could correctly be interpreted as whatever feeling the figure was meant to have. He had already mastered human anatomy. As with the Pieta sculpture, his talent began to seep through the mallet and onto the marble, as his works came to life. People were amazed as to how he could capture the purity of the Mother of Christ, while applying the physical vigor of a pagan statue (Ripley, page 24). The sculpture of Bacchus, the Greek god of wine, was carved in a brand new perspective. Instead of an aged man of wisdom, Michelangelo’s version of Bacchus can be described as youthful and handsome. Once more, people are captivated by Michelangelo’s beautiful and unique interpretation of their god (Riley, page 22). Michelangelo was also a man of religion. He lived the Catholic faith, and this may be the reason why he vigorously worked on the Pieta sculpture for the Saint Peter’s church. He slept little during this project, but when he had completed it he was so proud of his work that he carved his name in the ribbon that ran across the Virgin’s breast (Riley, page 24). Michelangelo had a very distinct art style. He, however, approaches the audience in a more timid manner. All of his works are unique and are made in his exact image. He hardly used models; most of the figures are made from the way he imagined it. There are no borders on the people, they move freely while keeping a tight general design. Michelangelo took great interest in the human anatomy, and this showed in his work. Leonardo DaVinci also greatly valued the human anatomy, and took time to study it. His art includes passion and through his science you can see wisdom and creativity. He was intrigued with how things worked, and made many contributions to the world of science, as well as the world of art. The larger difference in their styles of art is the way they portray people. Leonardo seems to design his figures in stances that people can easily relate to. He gives them motions and expressions and allows them to perform and act as though they were really people. From this, onlookers can easily relate to Leonardo’s art. He also gives them softer looking skin, which makes them seem almost real. The colors and shades he applies bring the robes and drapery they wear to life and the depth emerges from their body, bringing about Leonardo’s knowledge of human anatomy. Michelangelo’s abilities bring him even further than this. His sculpturing skills are mastered to the point where the result appears to be an image frozen in time. He can take an image from his head and sculpt it exactly as he sees fit, and the realism is so shocking that one cannot help but to gape. Leonardo’s piece, The Annunciation, features an angel speaking with the Virgin Mary. In comparison to Michelangelo’s Kneeing Angel with a Candlestick, the robe’s on Leonardo’s angel fall rather stiffly, and the folds appear to be slightly linear, though you can see him branching off into a smoother feel than other artists in the Renaissance era. The robes on Michelangelo’s angel fall smoothly and seem to sweep over the torso and kneeling legs, complimenting the form and bringing more attention to the important pieces of the figure, such as the facial expression and the delicate wings on his back. Leonardo’s wings are held up high, rising just above the angel’s head. It is as if the angel can soar straight out of the painting. The paint is a darker shade to show lighting and give the wings depth (Gilbert, page 18). In Michelangelo’s statue, the wings are folded behind the back as he kneels. He is resting almost, as he presents the audience with a candle that he holds close to his body. The relaxed posture in which he is presented is very different in comparison to Leonardo’s angel, which looks rather serious as he speaks. Michelangelo’s angel seems a bit more forlorn in a sense. He could be kneeling before God, so he wears a solemn expression (Riley, page 20). Leonardo’s angel is strikingly realistic, but it remains to be merely a painting. When looking at Michelangelo’s sculpture, however, his realism is shocking and picture perfect. Both are pieces in which the audience can relate to, and it is clear why the artists are, to this day, extremely famous in the world of art. Michelangelo’s work is most well known for being extremely realistic, and in order to achieve this he studied the many varieties of art. This included the elements of design. He was able to simply imagine an image in his own likeness, grip the mallet in his hand and throw out the perfect design onto the marble base. Michelangelo’s art is distinct for many reasons, one of which being the way that the sculpture looks exactly like a person. He sculpts each statue as if it is real, making sure to include proper texture on the clothing and strands of hair. He correctly proportions the human anatomy, and the figures he designs are governed by the strict laws of symmetry and geometric design. Michelangelo feels as though the limbs should never protrude from the body, and it was likely a rule that nothing should stick out. He makes the figures as beautiful and yet the complexity is simple enough to allow the viewers to form stories of their own. The lines in the drapery are curved lines, and they flow together to appear softer, even if most of his works are made out of marble (Gromling, page 22). The same concepts apply to Michelangelo’s paintings, only when he paints with oils and tempera, the colors bring the people on the canvas to life. He always makes sure to center his pieces, never letting the main idea go astray. The focal points seemingly have the most detail, but the background images are key parts to each work as well. His characters are full and muscular, without being too large. Michelangelo preferred to think as a sculpture rather than a painter, even whilst painting. Firm outlines of the bodies and strong figures with detailed shading and outlining give the idea that the figures are three dimensional (Gromling, page 28). When sculpting, Michelangelo seemingly prefers using marble. Perhaps because it appeared as a softer material than other rougher stones, and the light coloring could easily give the appearance of skin. Michelangelo scarcely introduced a sculpture or painting with a distinct message. Instead, he applies symbolism in the way that he positions the figures, and carves their faces. Their feelings reflect outwardly, but remain on their faces. Most of the agony, happiness, or anger they feel is expressed inwardly, and it is up to the viewer to decipher the message of the sculpture. In many of Michelangelo’s work, he applies new appearance to old figures. The well known Catholic image of an older, wiser, Virgin Mary was practically stripped away when Michelangelo carved the Pieta. The message behind the marble may be Michelangelo’s own perception of how his youthful Mary appears. He sees her as a young mother who has lost her only son, and therefore portrays her as so. (Ripley, page 24) Another perception of Michelangelo’s is the shocking new image of the pagan god, Bacchus. Usually portrayed as an older, extremely muscular man, Michelangelo has sculpted Bacchus as another youthful figure, intoxicated from the fine wine in his cup. He has a lighter atmosphere about him, which is entirely unique in comparison to the average Bacchus perception. The message may be showing he carelessness of a drunken youth, elaborated by the robes that have been removed and the standing position in which young Bacchus is in. The grapes entwined in his curly hair represent the fact that he is the god of wine, as well as the full glass of fresh wine in his hand. Michelangelo had a habit of almost sneaking in select features that decipher who the focal point of the scu lpture truly is. By doing this, he almost creates an air of mystery, leaving some room for thought for the viewers (Ripley, page 28). One artist that may be interesting to compare Michelangelo to is Bernini. Bernini lived through the Baroque eracharacterized by dramatic lights and darks, twisting torsos and abstract movements, dramatic and emotional expressions and themes, and large facadeswhereas Michelangelo lived through the Renaissance era. There is a key difference between the manners in which you are made to view the statues of these periods. Renaissance statues were made frontal, and viewers were only meant to look at the statues from the sides. But, this changed in the Baroque era. Sculptors began to recognize that creating a piece of art and detailing it equally on all sides made for a more intriguing work to look at. They carved them to tell a story, and were often made in mid-action so that the onlookers would have been challenged to walk around the piece and take in all of the different views in order to piece the story together. Michelangelo was an amazing sculptor, but he like many others of his time, remained true to the use of geometric style and the frontal view. Bernini, who remained true to the dramatic and expressive artist style that the Baroque era was famous for, was not afraid to extend the limbs of his figures, to throw them into an action rather than have them embrace themselves. Instead, they could embrace the air by expanding on the space around them. Bernini also took emotions to extremes. Though Michelangelo could easily sculpt a piece that he could relate to; giving it a soft expression of sadness or accurate anger, Bernini had a tendency to exaggerate emotions. Some of his works had expressions of extreme anger, such as the famous statue David. In comparison, Michelangelo also sculpted a statue of David. But, the two are in different stances. Michelangelo’s David is preparing for the battle, while Bernini’s David is in mid-battle stance. Bernini’s David is placed in an extremely energetic stance and a new formula rid Bernini’s works of the Mannerism in which Michelangelo worked to raise. His David has physical concentration at the moment before laying a blow to the Giant, who, of course is not part of the sculpture. Rather, this image is left for the viewers to imagine. He is in a solid stance with his feet firmly place on the ground, and his eyes transfixed on his opponent. It is the imagination’s job to create the image of what the Giant appears to be. The space Bernini left for our minds to fill is enough to keep one completely entranced with his sculpture. The boundary between us and the figure has seemingly dissolved. The transfixed gaze of young David is almost eyelevel with an onlooker, and one can only imagine themselves in place of the giant. The spatial qualities are rich, and the movement in depth leads to the intentional purpose of allowing many different ways to view the sculpture to arise. In order to really understand the story, one must study it from several different viewpoints. Given the right positioning, the movement of swinging the sling comes to life, as the movement of the arms, legs, body and neck fit together like pieces of a puzzle (Wittkower, page 5). The concentration and energy on David’s face are epitomized with tight lips, strained muscles on the lower face, flaring nostrils, pinched brow, and sharp eyes. The realism in the piece is striking (Wittkower, page 6). In comparison, Michelangelo’s David shows much less facial expression, and is posed in a manner which makes one think it is an image frozen in time. His face doesn’t speak well of the inner tension he feels as he prepares to face the Giant, but his brow is curved around the eye in a manner which suggest the agony he may feel. His body is that of ideal beauty, and he leans on one hip to the side, with his arm bent up near his face, the sling being held close to his shoulder. His head is turned and he seems to be gazing off into the distance, either pondering the battle to come or sizing up his opponent; Goliath. His stance is relaxed, yet he appears to be poised for action, as if he could spring to life at any moment (Harris, page 12). Michelangelo was an extremely important figure in the Renaissance era, and was a well adapt figure within the transition to the Baroque period. He is influential in the future works of other artists, and he was one of the few artists to truly master the human anatomy. He took part in a great deal of forming Mannerism, and elaborated on expressions which brought forth encouragement in other artists to add complexity to the outwardly emotions. In conclusion, Michelangelo was a man with a great eye for sculpture and painting, and he produced pieces which are unique enough to captivate mankind up until this day.

Blackadder Goes Forth Ending Essay Example

Blackadder Goes Forth Ending Essay Example Blackadder Goes Forth Ending Paper Blackadder Goes Forth Ending Paper A situation comedy, or a sit-com, is a comedy series projected from radio or television. The programme itself is based upon how characters react to unusual or comic situations. Situation comedies follow specific characters that encounter situations and then they try and deal with them. In each episode of a situation comedy, the story follows the same characters. Most situation comedies are set in a specific place that forms the set for every episode. A flat is commonly used in situation comedies for the set. Popular examples of flat share situation comedies are Only Fools and Horses and Friends. These two sit-coms are extremely popular, and both are set in a flat. Situation comedies used to form gaps in between more important shows. This was soon changed as the demand for sit-coms massively grew. They are now one of the most dominant television genres around. Blackadder is a situation comedy. It is a most unusual sit-com as in each series the scene is based on a different timeline. Blackadder has been through Elizabethan times, many other timelines and important historical times, and then ends up with the final series in World War One. Most other sit-coms dont do this instead each of their different series is set on the same timeline and in the same place. This is one of the points that make Blackadder different, as in each series the eager watchers dont know what to expect. Blackadder goes forth is also different from the usual sit-com as it is the same situation every episode. The majority of sit-coms dont do this, instead they are based in the same place, but with a different humorous situation with which the characters have to deal with. In Blackadder Goes Forth the situation is exactly the same just the characters deal with it differently. The situation is that Blackadder himself is trying to escape and relieve himself of the hideous atrocities of the First World War. Of course like in any other sit-com, things go very wrong for him and comic experiences pop up along the way. Altogether Blackadder fits into the situation comedy genre in a sense, as it is a sit-com, but is totally different from the majority of other sit-coms. Blackadder has a different story every episode, involves the same characters in every episode, and takes place in the same place in every episode. The differences of Blackadder to the mainstream of sit-coms are shown obviously. This is shown in many ways; one is that Blackadder is set in different historical time in each different series. This attracts viewers to watch Blackadder, because they want to see something new rather than the usual flat share show with people shouting bawdy jokes. This is why the producers of Blackadder have made the show different from the usual sit-com. Another reason why Blackadder is different from most sit-coms is that the situation is the same in every episode of Blackadder. Nearly every other sit-com has different situations and different ways in which the characters tackle these situations. Blackadder Goes Forth doesnt. The situation is of Blackadder trying to escape the war in any way he can. He tries lots of different approaches to deal with his problem, but every episode he fails. This becomes very amusing as no matter how hard he tries; he just cant get out of fighting in the war. Another very important feature in Blackadder that is dissimilar to other sit-coms is the way that even though the scene is set on a historical time scale, Blackadder still has 20th Century views. All the other characters in the whole programme have views of life that relate to the time scale that they are set in, while Blackadder has views of life that we would. This is what makes Blackadder so hilarious to us, as we can relate to precisely what Blackadder is saying and thinking, while all the other characters in the play are trapped in that time zone with historical thoughts, Blackadder makes fun of all the stupid things that happened within that time zone and has the same views and points to express as we do. The one other reason why Blackadder Goes Forth doesnt fit well into the genre of situation comedies is that Blackadder uses satirical comments and elements throughout the programmes. This makes the programme extremely funny, but also makes a point in which we can understand and learn from. Satire is using humour or exaggeration to show what it is bad about a person or thing. Blackadder uses this strongly in all of its episodes in all of its series. Blackadder: Well George, I strongly suspect your long wait for certain death is nearly at an end This is portraying the scene that everyone who wanted action in the war is going to be sent to his or her deaths. The reason why the produces of Blackadder decided to make different historical time scales for their series was possibly so they could use satire to make a point about those different time lines. With Blackadder using satire in this way it gives viewers the humour and hilarity that we get and love from all sit-coms, but also spreading a point across the country about how bad those situations were and how badly our ancestors handled them. So the reason why Blackadder is a funny character is because he is the only sane man and fools surround him. This makes us learn from mistakes that have happened in the past but also provides us with the amusement that we want when we watch a sit-com. Satirical elements are present in Blackadder, even in the title sequence at the start of each episode. There are many satirical elements in the title sequence; the first one being the two rows of five men marching after a sergeant majors command. The first row of soldiers is bandsmen wearing the traditional red colours of the English army. The second row of soldiers is armed forces, wearing the up-to-date camouflage green. This is satirizing the tactics of the British army. The way in which Blackadder does this is by having the bandsmen in red marching in front of the armed forces, it symbolizes that the bandsmen are more important. It shows that playing instruments and wearing smart colours and clothes into battle is more important then staying undetected with camouflage and looking scruffy. This satirizes British tactics and approach to war. It also shows that the British army is out of date, as fighting in bright colours was a thing of the past, showing that the commanders were just old forgotten war heroes who needed to be slapped up-to-date if they wanted to keep their men alive. It also satirizes the fact that blood is to come for those soldiers are behind. The blood red of the bandsmen shirts marching in front of the armed forces means that blood is to come for them and pour from their bullet stricken bodies. There is a character in Blackadder Goes Forth, named baldrick. In the title sequence he is out of place in the band and is franticly running around to find his place. Baldrick is a private in the army. This satirizes the privates as being stupid and out of place fighting in such a war. Also that Baldrick is in the band, and not in the armed forces row like he should be satirizes that he is out of place in the army, and will do more good playing a triangle in a parade. As baldrick is out of place, there is still no place for him in the ranks of men as both are of equal numbers and there is no more room for him. This emphases the point even more that the dim privates are out of place in the war, and they shouldnt be put there, as they dont understand it. How can a man be expected to shoot if he cant even find a place in a band? This is the satirizing point that Blackadder is making when the character baldrick is out of position. Also in the title sequence General Melchett and Captain Darling are standing atop a podium watching the soldiers march. General Melchett is wearing cavalry clothes. This satirizes the generals in the war by showing that they are out of touch and out of date with the tactics of war. They still think that cavalry are the best option to winning a battle, but now that machine guns have been invented cavalry are useless. Yet the generals do not know this, and assume that old tactics are good, but they arent. Captain Darling is cowering behind the General. This satirizes the Captains in the war. This shows that they were cowards and used the Generals as protection to stop them having to fight. Further on in the title sequence Lieutenant George is smiling in a childish way as he marches forwards. This is satirizing the pompous Lieutenants. Showing that they believe that war is just a game, and they should enjoy every minute off it. This is of course the wrong attitude to take to war, as you killed be obliterated any second. Aside from the title sequence, the whole programme contains satirical elements throughout its course, one of these being the living conditions of the soldiers shown in the programme. Blackadder opens up the programme of the last ever episode of Blackadder goes forth with: Hullo, Somme Public Baths. No running, shouting or piddling in the shallow end. Aside from this being droll, it also makes a great satirical point on how the living conditions of the soldiers actually were. The soldiers were caked in mud up to their elbows and sopping wet with the continuous moral beating rain. It satirizes how bad the living conditions really were by basically saying it was wet, and the rain was the least of the soldiers problems at that time. Private baldrick explains that the coffee that all the soldiers have been drinking for months is actually hot mud. He also describes what each of the elements of the coffee is. He states that the milk is saliva, the sugar is dandruff and although he doesnt state what the chocolate sprinklings are, he gives us a very good idea of what they could be! All this satirizes the living conditions of the poor soldiers that had to live in here day in and day out. They were soaked in rain, encrusted in mud, and drinking hot mire with all manner of things inside, but worst of all being pounded by shells all day long. Blackadder Goes Forth also satirizes everyones attitudes to war. Starting with the Generals, they had the worst attitude towards war. As the Generals were not in the trenches and not experiencing the horrors of war, they had no idea what it was like. The generals still thought war was what it used to be, fighting against unarmed enemies that cant win the fight. As general Melchett explains, That pigmy woman with the sharpened mango could have seriously Apart from this being comical, it has a real satirizing point to it. The old wars in which the English used to fight were against aborigines with no weapons other than maybe a spear. The English couldnt really loose a battle against such little an opposition, and from that day they thought they could win any battle that faced them, as they were full of themselves over their glorious victories. This is the attitude that the generals still possessed when commanding in World War One, especially in the Somme area that Blackadder goes forth is set. It satirizes the generals lack of understanding of modern warfare, and shows how they believe they will always win. In the episode Goodbyeee, Field Marshall Haig is playing with toy soldiers. This is satirizing the generals perspective of warfare, and apart from it being hilarious it proves just what the generals were like. They thought that war was a game and that it didnt matter who won or lost. This is shown as Haig knocks over a handful of the plastic soldiers on his model battlefield. Blackadder himself satirizes the advance and progress the army has made while at war, Weve advanced as far as an asthmatic ant with heavy shopping. Apart from this being droll, it satirizes how far the army progresses with such stupid and out of date tactics and childish generals. This relates highly to World War One as the army progressed about a few inches a year, as the generals just didnt know what to do. Another main thing that is satirized is the ranks of different troops. With the generals, they thought that war was just a game. This is shown and satirized in Blackadder by the way the general plays with toy soldiers. He used this as his tactics, moving individual toys and then knocking them over in one fell swoop. This actually shows that he expected his men to die, but sent them in regardless of the consequences, as he was bored of sitting in one place for a long period of time. Being incredibly child-like satirizes the lieutenants. This is shown in the character George. He is satirizing the pompous upper-class lieutenant. He always has a silly grin on his face and relates everything that happens in the war to a well know game of some sort. He even states that he played tiddly winks when signing up to volunteer for the war. He makes such remarks as by saying, we ducked and we dived. This is satirizing views of many soldiers in the war, as they just didnt have a clue about what it was really like. They just thought it was like participating in a sport match, and whatever the outcome, no one would get hurt, but how wrong they were. The other rank that is displayed and satirized in Blackadder is the private. Baldrick plays this role, and acts as the dim private, which is exactly what he is. He is always one step behind everyone else, in the mental way, and in the literal way. As in the title sequence he is behind everyone, and in the speeches he is behind everyone. He is satirizing the low-class dim private. At the end of the last episode Goodbyeee, just before they are about to go over the top, baldrick is more concerned about getting a splinter while climbing the ladder then getting mowed down in a hail of lead by a machine gun. This is because he doesnt understand what is going on. This is satirizing the fact that the dim people shouldnt be there, because if they dont understand what they are doing, how can they possibly fight? Captain Blackadder plays the other rank. He is the only commonsensical man in the whole warfare situation. This is how Blackadder is made funny, as he satirizes everything around him and makes fun of everything. He shares our views of the war, and tries in vain to get out of fighting just as we would, but to no amend, as the generals cant understand why he would possibly not want to go out and fight. This satirizes the generals lack of understanding. Fools surround Blackadder, this satirizes that everyone fighting was a fool, and with such stupid people everywhere, how can they win the war. It also satirizes that no one understands the war, no matter how clever or how high rank. And that everyone is as stupid as the private as they have no idea to fight a war more than he does. The equipment is the last thing that is satirized. This is done by the sticks that the higher ranking officers hold. These sticks do nothing at all. I wouldnt want to face a machine gun without one of these George explains to Blackadder. This is satirizing the fact that some of the equipment had no purpose, and some of the people didnt have a clue what a machine gun could actually do to you.

Hygrometer a Weather Instrument that Measure Humidity

Hygrometer a Weather Instrument that Measure Humidity A hygrometer is a weather instrument used to measure the amount of humidity in the atmosphere. There are two main types of hygrometers a dry and wet bulb psychrometer and a mechanical hygrometer. What is Humidity? Humidity is the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere caused by condensation and evaporation. It can be measured as absolute humidity (the amount of water vapor in a unit volume of air), or a relative humidity (the ratio of moisture in the atmosphere to the maximum moisture the atmosphere can hold). It is what gives you that uncomfortable sticky feeling on a hot day and can cause heat stroke. We feel most comfortable with relative humidity between 30% and 60%. How do Hygrometers Work? Wet and dry bulb psychrometers are the most simple and common way of measuring humidity. This type of hygrometer uses two basic mercury thermometers, one with a wet bulb one with a dry bulb. Evaporation from the water on the wet bulb causes its temperature reading to drop, causing it to show a lower temperature than the dry bulb. Relative humidity is calculated by comparing the readings using a calculation table that compares the ambient temperature (the temperature given by the dry bulb) to the difference in temperatures between the two thermometers. A mechanical hygrometer uses a slightly more complex system, based on one of the first hygrometers designed in 1783 by Horace Bà ©nà ©dict de Saussure. This system uses an organic material (usually human hair) that expands and contracts as a result of the surrounding humidity (that also explains why you always seem to have a bad hair day when it’s hot and humid!). The organic material is held under slight tension by a spring, which is linked to a needle gauge that indicates the level of humidity based on how the hair has moved. How Does Humidity Affect Us? Humidity is important for our comfort and our health. Humidity has been linked to sleepiness, lethargy, lack of observations, lower observation skills, and irritability. Humidity also plays a factor in heat stroke and heat exhaustion. As well as affecting people, too much or too little humidity can affect your possessions. Too little humidity can dry out and damage furniture. In contrast, too much humidity can cause moisture stains, condensation, swelling, and mold. Getting the Best Results from a Hygrometer Hygrometers must be calibrated at least once a year to ensure they provide the most accurate results possible. Even the best, most expensive hygrometer’s accuracy is likely to alter over time. To calibrate, place your hygrometer in a sealed container alongside a cup of salt water, and place it in a room where the temperature stays relatively constant throughout the day (e.g. not by a fireplace or front door), then leave it to sit for 10 hours. At the end of the 10 hours, the hygrometer should display a relative humidity level of 75% (the standard) if not, you need to adjust the display.

Equity Research Report on Whitbread plc Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Equity Research Report on Whitbread plc - Essay Example The ratio analysis highlights the fact that the liquidity position of Compass Group Plc is better than that of Whitbread Plc. However, it is deduced that the profitability condition of Whitbread Plc is better than the former. From the ratio analysis and equity valuation method, it can be concluded that Whitbread Plc is a profitable company for the investors since it has increased its net income over the four years period from 2010-2013. It is recommended that Whitbread Plc should increase its asset base by improve the cash and equivalent by decreasing its operating expense. The increase in asset base will assist the company to become one of the strongest players in the industry. Whitbread Plc  is a  coffee shop,  multinational  hotel and restaurant company, which are headquartered in  Dunstable, United Kingdom (UK). It is regarded as the largest division in  Premier Inn. Premier is known to be the largest hotel brand in UK, which encompasses about 650 hotels comprising over 50,000 rooms (Whitbread Plc., 2011). It is as the leading hospitality company in UK. The company employs around 43,000 individuals who devote their hard work for its success (Whitbread Plc., 2011). They are motivated to provide their best services to customers every day. The number of customers visiting their coffee shop, hotels and restaurants is 22 million every month (Whitbread Plc., 2011). The financial statement of Whitbread Plc highlights transactions that have taken place throughout the year. It not only depicts profit or loss of company, but also gives opinion to investors about condition of the company financials. The framework for financial reporting that is applied during preparation of financial statement is International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS), which is adopted by the European Union. The report is prepared for management of the company and also for investors. The managers have given their views regarding performance of the

The Manipulation of Language used in Brave New World and Animal Farm Essay

The Manipulation of Language used in Brave New World and Animal Farm - Essay Example In doing so, there is chaos and disturbance which gives the reader an apocalyptic image of the world. For example, in Brave New World the society is made to conform to a certain culture and belief system. It is trained into believing that everyone is destined to be in the role that they have been placed into, by influence as the Director of Hatcheries in the novel puts it: "that is the secret of happiness and virtue - liking what you've got to do. All conditioning aims at that: making people like their inescapable social destiny.† (Huxley, Ch. 1. 1946). The Director of Hatcheries uses his language to keep all the lower classes content with what they had and to explain to them that that was the only way that they could lead a life. Mustapha Mond believes that the future idealistic world will consist of conditioned and processed humans who will submit to the social conventionality. Hence, he governs a very surreal image of humans who are driven away from books and obliged to chas e after science. Mond uses his knowledge of the Bible and language of Shakespeare to control a totalitarian state. He makes language a paradox for others, so much so that when John quotes the words from The Tempest, â€Å"brave new world†, there is more hostility involved in it than awe because Mustapha Mond creates the World State to look at things in such a manner. Likewise, the language of the pigs becomes ridiculously elitist, controlling, incoherent and a meandering discourse when they speak. This technique highlights the usurpation of power as one of the dominant themes of the novel. The language controls the reality. The linguistic skills of the pigs overpower the undersized language of the rest of the animals. The novel opens with the narrative that quickly ascertains the dominance of language through the speech of old Major who â€Å"was so highly regarded on the farm that everyone was quite ready to lose an hour’s sleep in order to hear what he had to sayâ⠂¬  (Orwell, Ch.1. 1954). This sets an authoritative and paternal language structure which is hammered into the other animals like a mandatory act or law even after his death: â€Å"Our lives are miserable, laborious and short. We are born, we are given just so much food as will keep the breath in our bodies, and those of us who are capable of it are forced to work to the  last atom of our strength; and the very instant that our usefulness has come to an end we are slaughtered with hideous cruelty. No animal in England knows the meaning of happiness or leisure after he is a year old. No animal in England is free. The life of an animal is misery and slavery: that is the plain truth. But is this simply part of the order of nature?† (Orwell, Ch.1. 1954) This is probably the most ironic speech in the novel. What Old Major believes he and his fellow animal kingdom has witnessed about humans, the animals have to undergo under the pigs’ rule after Old Major’s depart ure. When Orwell says â€Å"The great enemy of clear language is insincerity† (Orwell, PE, 1947, para 13) he means precisely under these circumstances. He emphasizes that dictatorship ruins the language of a particular region according to history. The pigs are insincere towards their fellow

Readers Find Simple Faith in Karons Books Essay -- Jan Karons Mitfor

Readers Find Simple Faith in Karon's Books Since 1994 Jan Karon's Mitford series of novels has sold more than three million copies, with the latest, A New Song, occupying the number one position on Amazon.com's list during the last week of April this year (Jones 71). The Mitford books focus on inspirational stories, spiritual themes, and small town humor. Readers identify with the realistic characters in the stories. Rogene Kellar, 83, in a Newsweek article said she has read each book four times. Kellar further remarked, "I think you feel better having read them, but it's not goody-goody." Kellar's daughter, Carol Montgomery 57, said, "It gives you peace." The Mitford books enjoy a following of devoted readers and have also become marketable in another way. Hallmark plans to release the Mitford collection of greeting cards and collectible knick-knacks soon. Penguin Books publishes a quarterly Mitford reading group discussion guide and the newsletter, More from Mitford. Additionally, respected women's magazines such as Victori a have retained Karon as Writer in Residence publishing pieces of short fiction about Mitford. However, despite all of the attention, some readers want more of Karon. Lauren Winner in a recent article, "Karon's Agenda," published in Christianity Today finds: The Mitford books are strikingly bereft of anything controversial--no women priests or church wardens, for example, are ever mentioned, nor is the issue that is currently threatening to divide the Episcopal church in America--homosexuality. . . .I believe Karon would only do her readers a service by tackling these admittedly explosive questions head-on. (Winner 65) Winner asserts Karon avoids such issues in the books "presumably because they... ..., but they remain the issues that most, common, citizens face in their communities. So perhaps a simple, "day-to-day" faith is sufficient after all. Works Cited Jones, Malcolm. "Touched by Angels." Newsweek May 3, 1999: 71-72. Karon, Jan. At Home in Mitford. New York: Penguin Books, 1994. Karon, Jan. A Light in the Window. New York: Penguin Books, 1995. Kaorn, Jan. These High, Green Hills. New York: Penguin Books, 1996. Karon, Jan. Out to Canaan. New York: Penguin Books, 1997. Karon, Jan. A New Song. New York: Viking Books, 1999. The Student Bible: New International Version. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Bible Publishers, 1986. Tompkins, Jane. Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction 1790- 1860. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985. Winner, Lauren. "Karon's Agenda." Christianity Today July 12, 1999: 64-65.

Bhagavad Gita on Krishnas Teachings

5. Bhagavad Gita The story in the Bhagavad Gita with Arjuna and Krishna has many teachings of Krishna about renunciation, selfless services, and meditation. It’s also important why Arjuna doesn’t want to wage war. There are many things that Krishna tells Arjuna. All of this will be brought up throughout the essay. In the story Arjuna does not want to wage war. His sudden reaction is reasoned by his internal feelings for this war. Arjuna doesn’t understand why he should have his family risk their lives in the war. Arjuna also does not agree with this war because he really does not like the kingdom that rules him anyways.Arjuna does not want to renounce his worldly possessions for peace in the action. At this point in time Arjuna doesn’t understand the selfless service in this action of war. Krishna appears in a bright light to Arjuna when Arjuna asked to see him. Krishna came to Arjuna to help him understand why he was being asked to wage war for the kingdo m. Krishna tells Arjuna many things when they are together discussing the war. Krishna begins by telling Arjuna about the life and death cycle of a Hindus. The life and death cycle in Hinduism is based on the persons Karma.Their Karma is what decides the reincarnation process and/or being of their next body. In Hinduism the reason of the life and death cycle is to work on their Karma. Krishna then explains that truly divine humans find peace in serving the gods. Therefore, Arjuna needs to be at peace with what Krishna and the other gods are asking of him in this war. This was to explain to Arjuna that he needs to find peace in his actions but not to renounce his worldly possessions for it. Arjuna again is struggling with allowing his family fight in this war where they could lose their lives.Krishna then wants Arjuna to do this selfless service for him. Selfless service is a way of serving the gods and a good practice of Karma. Meditation is a way of arriving at selflessness. Medita tion helps break the rebirth and death cycle, because meditation is used to focus on achieving the divine. Krishna was able to convince Arjuna that this war was a good thing. Arjuna, after spending the time with Krishna, felt reassured that his worries were for no reason and this action would help in eternity. Krishna explains his reasoning to Arjuna.Arjuna than understood his task and the teachings of Krishna. Renunciation to find peace in the action of war was one teaching of Krishna. Committing this selfless service for the gods was good for Arjuna’s karma was the second lesson that was taught during their meeting. The last teaching of Krishna to Arjuna was about the importance of meditation. All of Krishna’s teachings to Arjuna revolved around creating a better Karma and therefore, ending the rebirth, life, and death cycle. Ending that cycle is over all goal of the Hindus religion.